Apparently the first Holland goal last night was perfectly valid - even though Panucci was lying injured off the field of play, in no way participating in the game, this was still enough to make Van Nistelrooy onside.
Isn't this odd? There is a specific rule that an attacker can be considered to be 'not interefering with play' and therefore not offside, yet when a defender is clearly not interefering with play he is still considered to be part of the game.
Such a stupid, stupid rule.
And yes, this post is motivated almost fully by bitterness in its purest and most vitriolic form.















10/06/08 @ 15:34